On Monday, we raised the issue of inaccuracies in the referendum question (or at least the question as was stated in the booklets distributed to the electorate by the ten cities holding mayoral referendums).
This article, by Channel 4 political correspondent Michael Crick, raises further doubts as to the wording (or lack of) on the ballot paper: could-three-little-words-undo-the-plan-for-some-city-mayors
Not for the first time, we ask how can any voter be expected to make such a crucial decision on the future of the governance of their city with the incorrect and incomplete information being placed before them?